Updated blogroll--so no one change their urls for a-while.
More and more, playing chess online, I'm seeing chess (or rather, having chess seep into me) as a form of metacognitive cybernetics. It's a cyberpunk frontline that goes deeper than Kasparov v. Deep Blue. At any given time on ICC, a decent number of opponents online are chess computers. Chess computers have their own tournaments. None of this, in of itself, is necessarily shocking. What has been happening more and more, from what I can garner, are the chess players becoming mechanical mammals: using chess software such as Fritz, grandmaster level software, dictates how games are analyzed and how players improve, creating hegemonical architectures for chess to fracture and slip inside of. With correspondence (postal) chess, when one is allowed to analyze the game during play, when does the computer take the lead in deciding where to move? Does impulse and free will become a cybersquatter to its own party?
This is the kind of sub-ject that poetry seems well suited for exploring. Stepping outside the field of pure tactics.
I'm still searching for a lack of style.